317 0

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author신우종-
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-28T01:33:20Z-
dc.date.available2019-05-28T01:33:20Z-
dc.date.issued2017-01-
dc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, v. 38, page. 33-39en_US
dc.identifier.issn0952-8180-
dc.identifier.issn1873-4529-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0952818017300338?via%3Dihub-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.hanyang.ac.kr/handle/20.500.11754/106062-
dc.description.abstractStudy objective: Administration of intranasal dexmedetomidine for sedation is comfortable and effective in children who are afraid of needles, and it offers efficient sedation similar to that of intravenous administration. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical effects of the pre-procedural administration of intranasal dexmedetomidine.Design: We identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared intranasal dexmedetomidine administration to other administration methods of various sedatives or placebo from MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, KoreaMed and hand searches of trial registries.Setting: Pediatrics who underwent interventional procedures and surgeries.Patients: Children under the age of 18.Interventions: Studies were included if they were compatible with the criteria that dexmedetomidine was administered intranasally.Measurements: We pooled data on the sedation status as the primary outcome and considered the behavioral score, blood pressure, heart rate and side effects to be secondary outcomes. Risk ratio (RR) and the standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively.Main results: This meta-analysis included 11 RCTs. The SMD for the sedative effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine was 2.45 (random, 95% CI; -3.33, -1.58) for continuous outcomes and RR of unsatisfactory patient outcome was 0.42 (M-H, random 95% CI; 026, 0.68 I-2 = 45%) for dichotomous outcomes compared to that of intranasal saline. The SMD for the sedative effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine was -0.41 (random, 95% CI; -1.09, 0.27 I-2 = 69%) for continuous outcomes and RR was 0.43 (M-H, random 95% CI; 0.32, 0.58 I-2 = 0%) for dichotomous outcomes compared to that of per os benzodiazepines.Conclusions: This review suggests that intranasal dexmedetomidine is associated with better sedative effects than oral benzodiazepines without producing respiratory depression, but it had a significantly delayed onset of effects. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INCen_US
dc.subjectDexmedetomidineen_US
dc.subjectIntranasalen_US
dc.subjectMeta-analysisen_US
dc.subjectRandomized controlled trialsen_US
dc.subjectSedationen_US
dc.subjectSystematic reviewen_US
dc.subjectDexmedetomidineen_US
dc.titleThe sedative effects of the intranasal administration of dexmedetomidine in children undergoing surgeries compared to other sedation methods: A systematic review and meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.volume38-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.01.014-
dc.relation.page33-39-
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Hyun Jung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorShin, Woo Jong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, Suin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAhn, Hyeong Sik-
dc.contributor.googleauthorOh, Jae Hoon-
dc.relation.code2017007568-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S]-
dc.sector.departmentDEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE-
dc.identifier.pidswj0208-
dc.identifier.researcherIDM-8518-2017-
dc.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-3786-2267-
Appears in Collections:
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S](의과대학) > MEDICINE(의학과) > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE