377 0

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author황승준-
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-10T05:24:31Z-
dc.date.available2019-05-10T05:24:31Z-
dc.date.issued2017-12-
dc.identifier.citation산업경영시스템학회지, v. 40, No. 4, Page. 191-202en_US
dc.identifier.issn2287-7975-
dc.identifier.issn2005-0461-
dc.identifier.urihttp://db.koreascholar.com/Article?code=338621-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.hanyang.ac.kr/handle/20.500.11754/103823-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study is to develop an engineer competency model using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to improve the national technical qualification system. Korea has managed technical human resources at the government level through the operation of a national technical qualification system that certifies engineers with national certificates or technical grades by laws. However, there have been increasing concerns that the government system is separated from global standards and does not reflect an engineer’s comprehensive capabilities. For these reasons, the new architecture of the system has been continuously discussed and becomes a major policy issue of the Korean government. For the development of the engineer competency model, domestic and global models were separately structured using 554 valid questionnaires with a consistency ratio (CR) of 0.1 or less. The relative importance of engineer competency factors in a domestic model was career (0.383), qualification (0.253), academic degree (0.195), and job training (0.169) whereas the order in the global model was career (0.308), global ability (0.237), job training (0.175), domestic qualification (0.147), and academic degree (0.134). The results of AHP analysis indicated that the evaluation factors and methods recognized by engineers were different from a current government model focusing on domestic qualifications. There was also perceptual difference in the importance of engineer evaluation factors between groups depending on the type of organizations and markets. This means that it is necessary to reflect the characteristics of organizations and markets when evaluating engineer competency. Based on AHP analysis and literature reviews, this paper discussed how to develop a new engineer competency index (ECI) and presented two effective index models verified by simulation test using 59,721 engineers’ information. Lastly, the paper discussed major findings of our empirical research and proposed policy alternatives for the improvement of a national engineer qualification system. The paper contributes to the management of technical human resources since it provides quantitative competency models that are objectively developed by reflecting market recognition and can be effectively used by the policy makers or firms.en_US
dc.language.isoko_KRen_US
dc.publisher한국산업경영시스템학회en_US
dc.subjectNational Technical Qualification Systemen_US
dc.subjectEngineer Competency Indexen_US
dc.subjectEngineer Grade Systemen_US
dc.subjectHuman Resource Managementen_US
dc.subjectAHP Methodologyen_US
dc.title다면 AHP 방법론을 활용한 역량 모델링과 국가기술자격제도 개선 방안 도출en_US
dc.title.alternativeCompetency Modeling Using AHP Methodology and Improvement of National Technical Qualification Systemen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.no4-
dc.relation.volume40-
dc.relation.page191-202-
dc.relation.journal산업경영시스템학회지-
dc.contributor.googleauthor이재열-
dc.contributor.googleauthor황승준-
dc.relation.code2017019042-
dc.sector.campusE-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS[E]-
dc.sector.departmentDIVISION OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION-
dc.identifier.pidsjh-
Appears in Collections:
COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS[E](경상대학) > BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION(경영학부) > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE