258 0

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author안용한-
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-02T07:47:08Z-
dc.date.available2019-05-02T07:47:08Z-
dc.date.issued2017-04-
dc.identifier.citation대한건축학회 2017년도 춘계학술발표대회논문집, v. 37, No. 1, Page. 867-868en_US
dc.identifier.issn2287-5786-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/ArticleDetail/NODE07178697-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.hanyang.ac.kr/handle/20.500.11754/103223-
dc.description.abstractCommissioning which is not yet activated in Korea has a lot of advantages on green building. In this paper by analyzing international cases and references, the way of promotion of G-SEED was suggested. After then, This paper analyzed opinions of experts by using the Delphi method and divided evaluation items into main groups and sub groups. Based on the results, This paper proposes a practical G-SEED evaluation items and the improvement of grade considering the effectiveness of commissioning.en_US
dc.language.isoko_KRen_US
dc.publisher대한건축학회en_US
dc.subject빌딩 커미셔닝en_US
dc.subjectG-SEEDen_US
dc.subject델파이 분석en_US
dc.subjectBuilding Commissioningen_US
dc.subjectDelphi Methoden_US
dc.title빌딩커미셔닝 활성화를 위한 G-SEED 평가항목 제안en_US
dc.title.alternativeA Study on Suggesting Evaluation Items for Introduction of G-SEED for Promotion of Building Commissioning Processen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.page867-868-
dc.contributor.googleauthor김수련-
dc.contributor.googleauthor이상효-
dc.contributor.googleauthor안용한-
dc.sector.campusE-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES[E]-
dc.sector.departmentDIVISION OF ARCHITECTURE-
dc.identifier.pidyhahn-
Appears in Collections:
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES[E](공학대학) > ARCHITECTURE(건축학부) > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE