239 0

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author김영진-
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-01T00:32:08Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-01T00:32:08Z-
dc.date.issued2016-12-
dc.identifier.citation슬라브학보, 제31권, 제4호, Page. 101-135en_US
dc.identifier.issn1229-0548-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/ArticleDetail/NODE07082394-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.hanyang.ac.kr/handle/20.500.11754/101338-
dc.description.abstractThis paper aims to make comparison between “Eurasian regionalism” and “West-oriented regionalism” based on the discussion of the development of major regional organizations and regional integration established among the post-Soviet states, and to analyse the potentials, limitations of Eurasian regional integration and its challenges. This two regionalism indicate the confrontation of the regionalization process among the post-Soviet states. In some cases the Eurasian regionalism and West-oriented are presented as mutually exclusive projects causing internal divides within societies as it happens in Ukraine, Moldova, and Armenia. We still cannot say that the future of both regionalism projects is quite certain. West-oriented regionalism depends on the EU’s commitment to the project and the readiness to accept European values in the EaP participant countries. Eurasian regionalism, though, highly institutionalized lacks vision and agreement on what is ‘Eurasian’. In Russia, the concept of ‘Eurasia’ is often used as the opposite of the ‘West’ or ‘Atlantic’ Other, and it is expected that Eurasian integration will strengthen Russia’s position as a dominant power in the region to achieve the goal of Russian foreign policy to build multipolar world order. From several aspects, regionalization in Eurasia remains an unfinished project. In the first place, there are several competing regionalist projects, not one, emerging in the geographic space among the Europe, Russia, and the China-dominated East Asia. The Russia- driving regionalism has been primarily concerned about achieving Russia’s geopolitical and geo-economic goals. For Central Asian countries, regionalism means to open a space to balance potential Russian hegemony and a platform to resume their development. The Central Asian governments have discovered the real economic and political benefits provided by regionalization at early tines: a possibility of relying on several donor countries, instead of just one, an improved security and an enhanced international status.en_US
dc.description.sponsorship이 논문은 2007년 정부(교육과학기술부)의 재원으로 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행 된 연구임(KRF-2007-362-B00013)en_US
dc.language.isoko_KRen_US
dc.publisher한국슬라브.유라시아학회en_US
dc.subject지역통합en_US
dc.subject유라시아 지역주의en_US
dc.subject서구지향 지역주의en_US
dc.subject유라시아주의en_US
dc.subject유럽근린정책(ENP)en_US
dc.subject동방파트너십(EaP)en_US
dc.subjectRegional Integrationen_US
dc.subjectEurasian Regionalismen_US
dc.subjectWest-oriented Regionalismen_US
dc.subjectEuropean Neighborhood Policyen_US
dc.subjectEastern Partnership Programen_US
dc.title유라시아 지역통합의 동학: 유라시아 지역주의 對 서구지향 지역주의en_US
dc.title.alternativeDynamics of the Regional Integration in Eurasia: Eurasian Regionalism vs. West-Oriented Regionalismen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.no4-
dc.relation.volume31-
dc.relation.page101-136-
dc.relation.journal슬라브학보-
dc.contributor.googleauthor김영진-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Young Jin-
dc.relation.code2016017858-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakRESEARCH INSTITUTE[S]-
dc.sector.departmentASIA PACIFIC RESEARCH CENTER-
dc.identifier.pidyoungjinkim-
Appears in Collections:
RESEARCH INSTITUTE[S](부설연구소) > ASIA PACIFIC RESEARCH CENTER(아태지역연구센터) > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE