Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 박보영 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-03-21T01:57:18Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-03-21T01:57:18Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016-11 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | GUT AND LIVER, v. 10, NO. 6, Page. 925-931 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1976-2283 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2005-1212 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.gutnliver.org/journal/view.html?uid=994 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.hanyang.ac.kr/handle/20.500.11754/101060 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background/Aims: We are in the process of conducting a randomized trial to determine whether compliance with the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) for colorectal cancer screening differs according to the stool-collection method. This study was an interim analysis of the performance of two stool-collection devices (sampling bottle vs conventional container). Methods: In total, 1,701 individuals (age range, 50 to 74 years) were randomized into the sampling bottle group (intervention arm) or the conventional container group (control arm). In both groups, we evaluated the FIT positivity rate, the positive predictive value for advanced neoplasia, and the detection rate for advanced neoplasia. Results: The FIT positivity rates were 4.1% for the sampling bottles and 2.0% for the conventional containers; these values were significantly different. The positive predictive values for advanced neoplasia in the sampling bottles and conventional containers were 11.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], -3.4 to 25.6) and 12.0% (95% CI, -0.7 to 24.7), respectively. The detection rates for advanced neoplasia in the sampling bottles and conventional containers were 4.5 per 1,000 persons (95% CI, 2.0 to 11.0) and 2.4 per 1,000 persons (95% CI, 0.0 to 5.0), respectively. Conclusions: The impact of these findings on FIT screening performance was unclear in this interim analysis. This impact should therefore be evaluated in the final analysis following the final enrollment period. (Gut Liver 2016;10:925-931) | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | This study is being supported by a Korea Health Technology R&D Project grant through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI) (grant number: HI14C3411). The KHIDI is funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea. This study is also being supported by a grant from the National Cancer Center Foundation (NCCF) Research Project through the National Cancer Center, Republic of Korea (grant number: 1231270-1). Funding bodies have no role in the study design, study setting, analysis, or writing of the manuscript. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | EDITORIAL OFFICE GUT & LIVER | en_US |
dc.subject | Colorectal neoplasms | en_US |
dc.subject | Early detection of cancer | en_US |
dc.subject | Screening | en_US |
dc.subject | Intervention study | en_US |
dc.subject | Predictive value of tests | en_US |
dc.title | Performance of the Fecal Immunochemical Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening Using Different Stool-Collection Devices: Preliminary Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.relation.no | 6 | - |
dc.relation.volume | 10 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl15479 | - |
dc.relation.page | 925-931 | - |
dc.relation.journal | GUT AND LIVER | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Shin, Hye Young | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Suh, Mina | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Baik, Hyung Won | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Choi, Kui Son | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Park, Boyoung | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Jun, Jae Kwan | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Hwang, Sang-hyun | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Kim, Byung Chang | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Lee, Chan Wha | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Oh, Jae Hwan | - |
dc.relation.code | 2016005405 | - |
dc.sector.campus | S | - |
dc.sector.daehak | COLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S] | - |
dc.sector.department | DEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE | - |
dc.identifier.pid | hayejine | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.