287 0

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author한충수-
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-13T01:59:50Z-
dc.date.available2019-03-13T01:59:50Z-
dc.date.issued2016-11-
dc.identifier.citationCIVIL PROCEDURE, v. 20, NO. 2, Page. 45-65en_US
dc.identifier.issn1226-7686-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/ArticleDetail/NODE07069577-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.hanyang.ac.kr/handle/20.500.11754/100736-
dc.description.abstractIn 2014 Korean Code of Civil Procedure(KCCP) was revised to enlarge the scope of the recognition and enforcement of foreign decisions. Before the revision, Art. 217 KCCP describes the “foreign judgment” and acknowledged to have the same force shall be recognized for recognition and enforcement. In Korean civil procedural law there are tree types of decisions such as judgment, order and disposition. A judgment shall be rendered by the court(not by judge) and has res judicata. Also ordinarily a judgment needs a trial proceeding. In contrast, order and disposition have not res judicata and do not need necessarily trial proceeding. Through 2014 revision of Art. 217 KCCP and Art. 26 KCCE(Korean Code of Civil Enforcement) not only foreign judgment but also foreign order and disposition shall be included for recognition and enforcement. Now the author calls it “decision” including judgment, order and disposition. However, they did not regulate Foreign Provisional and Protective Measures(FPPM) explicitly and we doubt that FPPM could be included in foreign decisions. In these days provisional and protective measures already become decisive devices for securing debtor’s asset in international business and we should recognize and enforce the FPPM rendered through inter partes proceeding or hearings. According to The Korean Supreme Court’s decisions related with international civil litigations and insolvency cases, we could make a deduction that FPPM could be included in “decisions” for recognition and enforcement reasonably.en_US
dc.language.isoko_KRen_US
dc.publisher한국민사소송법학회en_US
dc.subject국제재판관할en_US
dc.subject외국재판의 승인 및 집행en_US
dc.subject외국보전처분의 승인 및 집행en_US
dc.subject외국도산절차의 승인 및 집행en_US
dc.subjectinternational jurisdictionen_US
dc.subjectrecognition and enforcement of foreign decisionsen_US
dc.subjectrecognition and enforcement of foreign provisional and protective measuresen_US
dc.subjectrecognition and enforcement of foreign insolvency proceedingsen_US
dc.title국제민사소송절차와 국제도산절차에서의 외국재판 – 외국보전재판의 승인 및 집행가능성을 중심으로 –en_US
dc.title.alternativeA Foreign Decision in the International Civil Litigation and International Insolvency Procedure – Focused on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Provisional and Protective Measureen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.no2-
dc.relation.volume20-
dc.relation.page45-65-
dc.relation.journal민사소송-
dc.contributor.googleauthor한충수-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHan, Choong-soo-
dc.relation.code2016018323-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakSCHOOL OF LAW[S]-
dc.sector.departmentHanyang University Law School-
dc.identifier.pidchoonghs-
Appears in Collections:
SCHOOL OF LAW[S](법학전문대학원) > Hanyang University Law School(법학전문대학원) > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE