386 206

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author박기철-
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-26T01:35:57Z-
dc.date.available2018-03-26T01:35:57Z-
dc.date.issued2013-07-
dc.identifier.citation대한골절학회지, 2013, 26(3), P.178-183, 6P.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1225-1682-
dc.identifier.urihttps://synapse.koreamed.org/DOIx.php?id=10.12671/jkfs.2013.26.3.178-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11754/52095-
dc.description.abstract목 적: 척추 및 골반환 손상이 동반된 불안정성 천골 골절에서 척추-골반 이행부위의 해리 유무에 따른 수술적 치료 방법의 결과를 알아보고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법: 2004년 7월부터 2011년 1월까지 척추 및 골반환 손상이 동반된 불안정성 천골 골절 환자 중 수술적 치료를 시행받은 16예를 대상으로 하였다. 척추-골반 해리가 동반된 경우를 1군으로 장골 나사못을 이용한 척추-골반 고정술을, 해리가 동반되지 않은 경우는 2군으로 경피적 장-천골 나사못 고정술을 시행하였다. 후향적으로 visual analogue scale (VAS) 및 oswestry disability index (ODI)를 이용한 임상적 결과 와 방사선학적 골유합 여부 및 시기에 대해 평가하였다. 결 과: 총 16예의 환자 중 척추-골반 해리가 동반되어 장골 나사못을 이용한 척추-골반 고정술을 시행한 1군은 8예였으며, 해리가 동반되지 않아 경피적 장-천골 나사못 고정술을 시행한 2군 또한 8예였다. 최종 추시시 두 군 모두에서 방사선학적으로 골유합을 얻을 수 있었으며, 임상적으로 양호한 결과를 확인할 수 있었다. 결 론: 척추-골반 해리가 동반된 경우에는 장골 나사못을 이용한 척추-골반 고정술을, 동반되지 않은 경우에는 경피적 장-천골 나사못 고정술을 고려해 보는 것이 좋을 것으로 사료된다.Purpose: To evaluate the outcomes of surgical treatment modality in unstable sacral fractures combined with spinal and pelvic ring injury depending on the presence of spino-pelvic dissociations. Materials and Methods: The subjects were 16 patients, with unstable sacral fractures combined with spinal and pelvic ring injuries, were operated from July 2004 to January 2011. The patients were divided into 2 groups depending on the presence of spino-pelvic dissociations: those with dissociations were group 1, and those without dissociations were group 2. Group 1 was treated with spino-pelvic fixations using iliac screw, while group 2 was treated with percutaneous iliosacral screw fixations. The availability of the radiological bony union with its application periods, and clinical results using visual analogue scale (VAS) and oswestry disability index (ODI) were evaluated, retrospectively. Results: Out of 16 patients, 8 patients in group 1 were treated with spino-pelvic fixation using iliac screw, and 8 patients in group 2 were treated with percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation. The mean bony union period was 17.4 weeks in group 1, and 19.6 weeks in group 2. The Mean VAS and ODI scores on the last follow-up were 2.5 points and 15.6 points in group 1, 2 points and 18.8 points in group 2, respectively. Both groups had favorable clinical results at the last follow up. Conclusion: For surgical treatments of unstable sacral fractures, spino-pelvic fixation using iliac screws is advised for cases with combined spino-pelvic dissociation, while percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation is advised for cases without combined dissociation.en_US
dc.language.isoko_KRen_US
dc.publisher대한골절학회(The Korean Society of Fractures)en_US
dc.subject천골 골절en_US
dc.subject척추-골반 해리en_US
dc.subject척추-골반 고정술en_US
dc.subject경피적 장-천골 나사못 고정술en_US
dc.subject장골 나사en_US
dc.subjectSacral fractureen_US
dc.subjectSpino-pelvic dissociationen_US
dc.subjectSpino-pelvic fixationen_US
dc.subjectPercutaneous iliosacral screw fixationen_US
dc.subjectIliac screwen_US
dc.title척추-골반 해리 동반 여부에 따른 불안정성 천골 골절의 치료en_US
dc.title.alternativeOriginal Article : Treatment of Unstable Sacral Fractures Related to Spino-Pelvic Dissociationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.no3-
dc.relation.volume26-
dc.identifier.doi10.12671/jkfs.2013.26.3.178-
dc.relation.page178-183-
dc.relation.journal대한골절학회지-
dc.contributor.googleauthor김홍식-
dc.contributor.googleauthor이정환-
dc.contributor.googleauthor박기철-
dc.contributor.googleauthor박예수-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Hong-Sik-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Jung-Hwan-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, Ki-Chul-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, Ye-Soo-
dc.relation.code2012218964-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S]-
dc.sector.departmentDEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE-
dc.identifier.pidkcpark-


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE