100 0

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author최준호-
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-23T07:36:39Z-
dc.date.available2018-03-23T07:36:39Z-
dc.date.issued2014-11-
dc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 권: 166, 페이지: 79-85en_US
dc.identifier.issn0165-0327-
dc.identifier.issn0165-0327-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.jad-journal.com/article/S0165-0327(14)00276-6/abstract-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11754/51530-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The Psychotic Depression Assessment Scale (PDAS) has been validated as a method of assessing the severity and treatment outcomes of psychotic depression (PD). We aimed to compare the results of the PDAS in PD and non-psychotic depression (non-PD) patients and validate the PDAS as a diagnostic tool for PD. Methods: We included 53 patients with PD and 441 with non-PD who participated in the Clinical Research Center for Depression study in South Korea. In addition to the PDAS, psychometric tools including the HAMD17, HAMA, BPRS, CGI-S, SOFAS, SSI-Beck, WHOQOL-BREF, AUDIT, and FTND were used to assess, respectively, depression, anxiety, overall symptoms, global severity, social functioning, suicidal ideation, quality of life, alcohol use, and nicotine use. Results: After adjusting for age and total HAMD17 score, PD patients had higher scores for depressive mood, hallucinations, unusual thought content, suspiciousness, blunted affect, and emotional withdrawal on the PDAS and higher total scores on the SSI-Beck than non-PD patients. Binary logistic regression identified hallucinatory behavior and emotional withdrawal as predictors of PD. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that emotional withdrawal could be used to differentiate psychotic from non-psychotic depression. Limitations: The inter-rater reliability for psychometric assessments was not evaluated. Conclusions: In addition to assessing the severity and treatment outcomes of PD, PDAS can help in the diagnosis of PD. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserveden_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by a grant of the Korean Health 21 Care Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (A102065). The Ministry of Health and Welfare had no further role in the study design, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of the data, in the writing of the report or in the decision to submit the paper for publication.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDSen_US
dc.subjectPsychotic Depression Assessment Scale (PDAS)en_US
dc.subjectPsychotic depression (PD)en_US
dc.subjectHallucinatory behavioren_US
dc.subjectEmotional withdrawalen_US
dc.subjectDifferential diagnosisen_US
dc.titleIs the Psychotic Depression Assessment Scale a useful diagnostic tool?: The CRESCEND studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.volume166-
dc.relation.page79-191-
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, Seon-Cheol-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChoi, Joon-ho-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Jae-Min-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJun, Tae-Youn-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Min-Soo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Jung-Bum-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYim, Hyeon-Woo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, Yong-Chon-
dc.relation.code2014032237-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S]-
dc.sector.departmentDEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE-
dc.identifier.pidjchoi-
Appears in Collections:
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S](의과대학) > MEDICINE(의학과) > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE