Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 최준호 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-03-23T07:36:39Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-03-23T07:36:39Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2014-11 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 권: 166, 페이지: 79-85 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0165-0327 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0165-0327 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.jad-journal.com/article/S0165-0327(14)00276-6/abstract | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11754/51530 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: The Psychotic Depression Assessment Scale (PDAS) has been validated as a method of assessing the severity and treatment outcomes of psychotic depression (PD). We aimed to compare the results of the PDAS in PD and non-psychotic depression (non-PD) patients and validate the PDAS as a diagnostic tool for PD. Methods: We included 53 patients with PD and 441 with non-PD who participated in the Clinical Research Center for Depression study in South Korea. In addition to the PDAS, psychometric tools including the HAMD17, HAMA, BPRS, CGI-S, SOFAS, SSI-Beck, WHOQOL-BREF, AUDIT, and FTND were used to assess, respectively, depression, anxiety, overall symptoms, global severity, social functioning, suicidal ideation, quality of life, alcohol use, and nicotine use. Results: After adjusting for age and total HAMD17 score, PD patients had higher scores for depressive mood, hallucinations, unusual thought content, suspiciousness, blunted affect, and emotional withdrawal on the PDAS and higher total scores on the SSI-Beck than non-PD patients. Binary logistic regression identified hallucinatory behavior and emotional withdrawal as predictors of PD. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that emotional withdrawal could be used to differentiate psychotic from non-psychotic depression. Limitations: The inter-rater reliability for psychometric assessments was not evaluated. Conclusions: In addition to assessing the severity and treatment outcomes of PD, PDAS can help in the diagnosis of PD. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | This study was supported by a grant of the Korean Health 21 Care Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (A102065). The Ministry of Health and Welfare had no further role in the study design, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of the data, in the writing of the report or in the decision to submit the paper for publication. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS | en_US |
dc.subject | Psychotic Depression Assessment Scale (PDAS) | en_US |
dc.subject | Psychotic depression (PD) | en_US |
dc.subject | Hallucinatory behavior | en_US |
dc.subject | Emotional withdrawal | en_US |
dc.subject | Differential diagnosis | en_US |
dc.title | Is the Psychotic Depression Assessment Scale a useful diagnostic tool?: The CRESCEND study | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.relation.volume | 166 | - |
dc.relation.page | 79-191 | - |
dc.relation.journal | JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Park, Seon-Cheol | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Choi, Joon-ho | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Kim, Jae-Min | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Jun, Tae-Youn | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Lee, Min-Soo | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Kim, Jung-Bum | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Yim, Hyeon-Woo | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Park, Yong-Chon | - |
dc.relation.code | 2014032237 | - |
dc.sector.campus | S | - |
dc.sector.daehak | COLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S] | - |
dc.sector.department | DEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE | - |
dc.identifier.pid | jchoi | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.