114 0

소비자・근로자 보호관할 제도의 현황과 개선 방안

Title
소비자・근로자 보호관할 제도의 현황과 개선 방안
Author
한충수
Keywords
소비자관할; 근로자관할; 보호관할
Issue Date
2013-05
Publisher
한국민사소송법학회
Citation
민사소송 CIVIL PROCEDURE, May 2013, 17, 209-239
Abstract
In 2001 the Korean Private International Law(KPIL) provides the special rules on jurisdiction for contracts with consumers(Art. 27) and special grounds of jurisdiction for individual contracts of employment(Art. 28) to protect them in the field of International jurisdiction as well as in the field of private international law. At that time KPIL adopted mainly the 1968 Brussels Convention on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters and it was revised and converted into Brussels I Regulation(Council Regulation (EC) No. 44/2001 of December 2000 on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters). Therefore,we have to review the clauses of protective jurisdictions in KPIL in order to reflect the changes of legal situation of Korean societies. In consumer protection area, e-commerce transactions were boosted and mobile consumers were also increased rapidly and needed seriously collective redresses such as class action and group litigation. And we have to revise protective jurisdiction clauses in KPIL to reflect the above mentioned social needs. As for the individual contracts of employment, problems of qualification of employee and status of dispatched workers were raised in these days. We have to examine some cases of the Korean Supreme Court which have handled related issues such as dispatched workers. Furthermore, the more we protect the consumers and employees in the field of international jurisdiction of civil litigation, the more the stronger parties(business operators and employers)try to make an arbitration agreement with the weaker parties to avoid protective jurisdiction clauses in the civil litigation. And we have to make another protective devices for the weaker parties in the field of Alternative Dispute Resolution such as an arbitration. Finally, in this article the newly revised Japanese Code of Civil Procedure for international jurisdiction will be dealt with the Hague Convention and Brussels I Regulation because international jurisdiction clauses of JCCP should be full of suggestions.
URI
http://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/ArticleDetail/NODE02187760http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11754/46384
ISSN
1226-7686
Appears in Collections:
SCHOOL OF LAW[S](법학전문대학원) > Hanyang University Law School(법학전문대학원) > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE