352 0

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author정은주-
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-13T07:38:24Z-
dc.date.available2018-03-13T07:38:24Z-
dc.date.issued2013-05-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Music Therapy, 2013, 50(2), P.66-92en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-2917-
dc.identifier.urihttp://eds.b.ebscohost.com/eds/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=364ec2d9-f5d5-4a0e-a977-cfd5f3d36085%40sessionmgr103&bdata=Jmxhbmc9a28mc2l0ZT1lZHMtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=88838233&db=eue-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11754/46178-
dc.description.abstractBackground: An estimated 1.5 to 2 million people sustain a traumatic brain injury (TBI) each year in the United States. Impairments in attention following TBI severely limit everyday functioning in a multifaceted manner. A precise assessment is critical in identifying the types of attention impairments and in recommending appropriate tasks to aid in attention rehabilitation. A Music-based Attention Assessment (MAA) was developed to fill this need and revised to reflect variations of attention ability that exist in the general population. Objective: The purpose of the study was to investigate the theoretically-based constructs of the Music-based Attention Assessment-Revised (MAA-R) using a factorial approach and to examine item properties and test reliability in relation to the exploratively-derived factor constructs. Methods: The MAA-R is a 54-item multiple-choice, melodic contour identification test, designed to assess three different types of auditory attention including sustained, selective, and divided attention. The psychometric validation of the MAA-R was conducted with healthy adults (n = 165) and patients diagnosed with a moderate to severe TBI (n = 22). Results: Exploratory factor analysis identified five factor constructs, including Sustained-Short, Sustained-Med to Long, Selective-Noise, Selective & Divided, and Divided-Long. After item elimination, the final 45-item MAA-R provided evidence of high internal consistency as computed by split-half reliability coefficients (r = .836) and Cronbach's alpha (Α = .940). Conclusion: The aggregate findings suggest that the MAA-R is a valid and reliable measure that provides assessment information in regards to the different types of auditory attention deficits frequently observed in patients with TBI. Development and revision issues as well as the use of melodic contours in auditory attention assessment are discussed along with suggestions for future research.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherThe American Music Therapy Associationen_US
dc.subjectassessmenten_US
dc.subjectattentionen_US
dc.subjectmusicen_US
dc.subjecttest development and validationen_US
dc.subjecttraumatic brain injuryen_US
dc.titlePsychometric validation of a Music-Based Attention Assessment: Revised for patients with traumatic brain injuryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/jmt/50.2.66-
dc.relation.page66-92-
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF MUSIC THERAPY-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJeong, Eunju-
dc.relation.code2013014168-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakDIVISION OF INDUSTRIAL INFORMATION STUDIES[S]-
dc.sector.departmentDIVISION OF INDUSTRIAL INFORMATION STUDIES-
dc.identifier.pidejeong-
Appears in Collections:
ETC[S] > 연구정보
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE