Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 류호경 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-02-12T01:43:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-02-12T01:43:30Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016-03 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 디자인학연구, v. 29, NO 1, Page. 99-109 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1226-8046 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2288-2987 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://aodr.org/_common/do.php?a=full&b=12&bidx=472&aidx=5955 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11754/36510 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background Cooperating with other designers is an essential aspect of every design project. This article empirically demonstrates that mixing up designers with different social traits would be better in co-design practices than forming a design team composed of members with similar traits. Here, one way to categorize designers’ social traits was by their tendency of having “social influence” as the classification of having either a dominant or submissive trait. Methods Six co-design groups were formed: two Group Mix-up D-S – one dominant type designer and one submissive type designer; two Group D-D – two dominant type designers; and two Group S-S – two submissive type designers. They were asked to develop a fictitious vacuum cleaner and think aloud in their co-design practice. Their verbal protocols were then analyzed to see how they behaved towards each other in their co-design decision-making. Result We found that mixing up the heterogeneous social traits in a team was better for triggering a heavy “test-retest” discussion (Group D-S), and teaming up designers with the same tendencies show either a quick affirmation (Group D-D) or a tendency for last-minute decision-making (Group S-S). Marrying different social styles is beneficial for leveraging a high level of design decision-making. Conclusions Our findings suggest that mixing up different social traits in co-design practices may induce design decision-making for robust and coherent solutions. Though a scaled-up study is further needed, diverse social styles in a co-design group could trigger the members to seek different design solution spaces and be less primed to a first ideation sketch. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | This work was supported by the research fund of Hanyang University (HY-2015) | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | 한국디자인학회 | en_US |
dc.subject | Co-Design | en_US |
dc.subject | Social Trait | en_US |
dc.subject | Social Influence | en_US |
dc.subject | Dominant | en_US |
dc.subject | Submissive | en_US |
dc.subject | Decision-Making | en_US |
dc.title | Mixing Up Social Traits for Co-Design Practices | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.relation.no | 1 | - |
dc.relation.volume | 29 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.15187/adr.2016.02.29.1.99 | - |
dc.relation.page | 99-109 | - |
dc.relation.journal | 디자인학연구 | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Seo, Kyoungwon | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Ryu, Hokyoung | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Song, Hakyoung | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Bouchard, Carole | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Kim, Jieun | - |
dc.relation.code | 2016019202 | - |
dc.sector.campus | S | - |
dc.sector.daehak | GRADUATE SCHOOL OF TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION MANAGEMENT[S] | - |
dc.sector.department | DEPARTMENT OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT | - |
dc.identifier.pid | hryu | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.