461 0

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author최원배-
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-07T02:47:12Z-
dc.date.available2018-02-07T02:47:12Z-
dc.date.issued2011-11-
dc.identifier.citation한국수학사학회지, 2011, 24(4), P.33-43(11)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1226-931x-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001604047-
dc.description.abstract이 글은 힐버트 프로그램 시기의 힐버트의 사상을 과연 도구주의로 볼 수 있는가 하는 문제를 다룬다. 이를 위해 먼저 힐버트를 도구주의자로 보는 논거들을 살펴보고, 이 견해에 대한 최근의 비판을 세 가지로 나누어 차례대로 검토한다. 이런 논의를 통해 힐버트를 도구주의자로 보는 견해는 여전히 유지될 수 있음을 보인다.In this paper I discuss if we can regard Hilbert at the time of Hilbert's program as an instrumentalist. For this I first provide some textual evidences for the instrumentalist interpretation, then examine the three recent criticisms in turn. I argue that the reading Hilbert as an instrumentalist is still tenable in spite of these criticisms.en_US
dc.language.isoko_KRen_US
dc.publisher한국수학사학회en_US
dc.subject힐버트en_US
dc.subject형식주의en_US
dc.subject도구주의en_US
dc.subject이념적 명제en_US
dc.subjectHilberten_US
dc.subjectformalismen_US
dc.subjectinstrumentalismen_US
dc.subjectideal propositionen_US
dc.title힐버트와 형식주의en_US
dc.title.alternativeHilbert and Formalismen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.no4-
dc.relation.volume24-
dc.relation.page33-43-
dc.relation.journal한국수학사학회지-
dc.contributor.googleauthor최원배-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChoi, Won-Bae-
dc.relation.code2012214460-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF POLICY SCIENCE[S]-
dc.sector.departmentDEPARTMENT OF POLICY STUDIES-
dc.identifier.pidchoiwb-
Appears in Collections:
COLLEGE OF POLICY SCIENCE[S](정책과학대학) > POLICY STUDIES(정책학과) > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE