9112 757

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChaemsaithong, Krisda-
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-18T02:15:27Z-
dc.date.available2017-04-18T02:15:27Z-
dc.date.issued2015-08-
dc.identifier.citation영어학연구, v. 21, NO 2, Page. 41-59en_US
dc.identifier.issn1598-9453-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/landing/article.kci?arti_id=ART002019871#-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.hanyang.ac.kr/handle/20.500.11754/26747-
dc.description.abstractDrawing upon a corpus of three high-profile Anglo-American trials, this study explores stance expressions in legal opening statements. Specifically, the study analyzes the forms and functions of stance resources such as self-mention, hedges, boosters, and attitude markers. The study finds stance expressions to permeate the opening statement. These devices, I argue, enable the lawyer to subtly bypass the legal constraints that prohibit explicit display of personal opinions and comments on the evidence.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisher한국영어학학회en_US
dc.subjectcourtroom discourseen_US
dc.subjectevaluationen_US
dc.subjectopening statementen_US
dc.subjectstanceen_US
dc.subjectstancetakingen_US
dc.titleStance Expressions in the Courtroomen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.no2-
dc.relation.volume21-
dc.identifier.doi10.17960/ell.2015.21.2.003-
dc.relation.page41-59-
dc.relation.journal영어학연구-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChaemsaithong, Krisda-
dc.relation.code2015039955-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF HUMANITIES[S]-
dc.sector.departmentDEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE & LITERATURE-
dc.identifier.pidkrisda-


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE