274 0

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author최준호-
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-12T05:00:18Z-
dc.date.available2017-01-12T05:00:18Z-
dc.date.issued2015-06-
dc.identifier.citationCOMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, v. 61, Page. 122-130en_US
dc.identifier.issn0010-440X-
dc.identifier.issn1532-8384-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010440X1500053X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11754/25101-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Our study aimed to assess the inter-rater and test-retest reliability, as well as concurrent and convergent validity, of the Korean version of the Scale for the Assessment of Thought, Language, and Communication (TLC scale). Methods The factor solutions and psychometric properties of the Korean version of the TLC scale were evaluated among 167 schizophrenia inpatients (study subjects) at two sites in South Korea. Using Pearson's correlation, the concurrent and convergent validities of each of the factor solutions were represented by the correlations with the scores on the Clinical Language Disorder Rating Scale, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Young Mania Rating Scale, and Calgary Depression Scale. Using receiver operating characteristics curves, the optimal cut-off score for the Korean version of the TLC scale to distinguish between study subjects with and without disorganized speech, was identified. Results: The results showed that the Korean version of the TLC scale has a three-factor solution: fluent disorganization, speech emptiness, and speech peculiarity. In addition, the intenater reliability of the Korean version of the TLC scale was moderately good (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.51) and its test-retest reliability was very good (Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.94). For detecting the current presence of disorganized speech, the optimal cut-off total score on the TLC scale was proposed to be 8 points (sensitivity = 88.1%; specificity = 82.9%). Limitations: Psychometric tools covering cognitive functions were not used in our study. Conclusions: The Korean version of the TLC scale is a promising psychometric method for examining formal thought disorder (FTD) and disorganized speech in schizophrenia patients. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipOur study was supported by the Choi Shin-Hai Neuropsychiatry Research Fund (2013) of the Korean Foundation of Neuropsychiatry Research. The funding source had no further role in the study design, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of the data, in the writing of the report or in the. decision to submit the paper for publication.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherW B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INCen_US
dc.subjectFORMAL THOUGHTen_US
dc.subjectRATING-SCALEen_US
dc.subjectDISORDERen_US
dc.subjectSCHIZOPHRENIAen_US
dc.subjectTRANSLATIONen_US
dc.titleReliability and validity of the Korean version of the Scale for the Assessment of Thought, Language, and Communicationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.volume61-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.comppsych.2015.04.002-
dc.relation.page122-130-
dc.relation.journalCOMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, Seon-Cheol-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJang, Eun Young-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Kang Uk-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Kounseok-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Hwa-Young-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChoi, Joonho-
dc.relation.code2015003503-
dc.sector.campusS-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S]-
dc.sector.departmentDEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE-
dc.identifier.pidjchoi-
Appears in Collections:
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE[S](의과대학) > MEDICINE(의학과) > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE