318 0

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author김용신-
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-28T06:46:17Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-28T06:46:17Z-
dc.date.issued2020-06-
dc.identifier.citationAnalytical Science and Technology, v. 33, no. 3, Page. 115-124en_US
dc.identifier.issn1225-0163-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002595260-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.koreascience.or.kr/article/JAKO202018436566550.page-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.hanyang.ac.kr/handle/20.500.11754/163393-
dc.description.abstractMarker pens belong to school things that are controlled by the regulation system called safety confirmation under special act on the safety of products for children with the formaldehyde criteria of 20 mg/ kg. With nine marker pens available commercially, formaldehyde in marker pen ink was analyzed by present test standard where marking on a fabric swatch with a pen and extracting the swatch in water and derivatization with Nash reagent followed by UV/Vis spectrophotometeric measurement (Nash-UV/Vis method), giving not detected results or a false positive result in case of a colored water extract. However, the contents of formaldehyde in ink of nine marker pens were determinded to range between 3.2 ~ 93.2 mg/kg with three results above the safety criteria of 20 mg/kg by HPLC/DAD measurements on DNPH derivatives of formaldehyde (DNPH-HPLC/ DAD method) in ink dissolved directly in water using an ultrasonic bath. Therefore, the DNPH-HPLC/DAD method with the extraction of ultrasonic dissolving ink in water is proposed as a proper method for analyzing formaldehyde in ink. The proposed method has advantages of lower detection limit and accuracy with colored extracts as well as a simple and fast extraction. The accuracy and precision of this method was estimated to be 90.1 ~ 105.4 % and 0.6 ~ 3.3 %, respectively by spiking tests in the ranges of 20 mg/kg and 40 mg/kg using matrixes such as highlighter pen ink, board marker ink, chalk marker pen ink and painter marker ink.en_US
dc.language.isoko_KRen_US
dc.publisherKorea Society of Analytical Scienceen_US
dc.subjectFormaldehydeen_US
dc.subjectmarker pen inken_US
dc.subjectsafety criteriaen_US
dc.subjectNash-UV/VISen_US
dc.subjectDNPH-HPLC/DADen_US
dc.titleMethod comparison for analyzing formaldehyde in marker pen inken_US
dc.title.alternative마킹펜 잉크 내 폼알데하이드 분석법 비교en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.no3-
dc.relation.volume33-
dc.identifier.doi10.5806/AST.2020.33.3.115-
dc.relation.page115-124-
dc.relation.journalAnalytical Science and Technology-
dc.contributor.googleauthor박광서-
dc.contributor.googleauthor최은경-
dc.contributor.googleauthor김용신-
dc.relation.code2020001322-
dc.sector.campusE-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND CONVERGENCE TECHNOLOGY[E]-
dc.sector.departmentDEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL AND MOLECULAR ENGINEERING-
dc.identifier.pidyongshin-


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE