710 0

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author이인호-
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-07T01:30:27Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-07T01:30:27Z-
dc.date.issued2005-06-
dc.identifier.citation중국어문논총, v. 28, Page. 107-130en_US
dc.identifier.issn1226-4555-
dc.identifier.urihttp://kiss.kstudy.com/thesis/thesis-view.asp?key=2453032-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.hanyang.ac.kr/handle/20.500.11754/110866-
dc.description.abstract爲了呈現蘇秦、張儀的奮鬪精神和成功人生, 司馬遷主要根據戰國策士及後人任意捏造的≪戰國策≫來寫作<蘇秦列傳>和<張儀列傳>. 因此<蘇秦列傳>和<張儀列傳>是可以小說閱讀, 不可以眞實的歷史看待的. 那?司馬遷歪曲了歷史?? 這又不然. 誰說≪史記≫是歷史著作? 司馬遷不是爲了歷史而寫歷史, 歷史只不過是個手段而已, ‘一家之言’才是其目的的. 正如孔子作≪春秋≫, ‘載之空言不如見之於行事之深切著明’者就是. 而所謂‘一家之言’者, 實屬諸子百家之流, ≪史記≫初出, 名曰‘太史公書’卽見其槪. 是故, 從後世的觀點來看太史公書, 不但是不能深切瞭解到司馬遷撰述≪史記≫的意圖及思想, 至於<蘇秦列傳>和<張儀列傳>的深刻含義也難以把握得住的.en_US
dc.language.isoko_KRen_US
dc.publisher중국어문연구회en_US
dc.subject사기(史記)en_US
dc.subject사마천(司馬遷)en_US
dc.subject소진열전(蘇秦列傳)en_US
dc.subject장의열전(張儀列傳)en_US
dc.subject허구(虛構)en_US
dc.title《사기(史記)》의 허구성(虛構性)과 사마천(司馬遷)의 인생관 - 소진(蘇秦),장의열전(張儀列傳)을 중심으로 -en_US
dc.title.alternativeA Study on the fictional character of Shiji and Simaqian`s view of Life especailly in the Suqin and Zhangyi Liezhuanen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.journal중국어문논총-
dc.contributor.googleauthor이인호-
dc.relation.code2012210676-
dc.sector.campusE-
dc.sector.daehakCOLLEGE OF LANGUAGES & CULTURES[E]-
dc.sector.departmentDEPARTMENT OF CHINESE STUDIES-
dc.identifier.pidpendar-
Appears in Collections:
COLLEGE OF LANGUAGES & CULTURES[E](국제문화대학) > CHINESE STUDIES(중국학과) > Articles
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE